2.12.2005

AAAAAAAAARRRRRGGGHHHHH! CRM 2005 Delayed Again!

Well, by now you have surely heard that Microsoft has delayed CRM 2005 again. After initial ship date targets were missed last year, Microsoft had said for some time that partners and customers could expect the much-needed (MUCH-NEEDED!) update in the second quarter of this year. With last week's hiring of ex-Peoplesoft exec Brad Wilson, the company announced yesterday that it will not release CRM 2005 until the end of 2005. (Should they rename it CRM 2007 just to be safe?)

This is greatly annoying and frustrating news. I understand that MS doesn't want to release CRM until it has gotten everything right -- which it should have done with version 1 -- but personally, my customers are in need of help now. I work in the small business space, all of my clients are on Small Business Server. Their investment in CRM is a significant one for the size of their business, and they bought it largely because of their trust in me and my company.

My company is of the old school partner variety -- a Certified partner. Last year, part of Microsoft's strategy to grow CRM's market share was to bring in partners like us who weren't traditionally in the MBS game. It was a big investment for us to get into CRM, and a risk we took by selling it to our clients. But I think we were misled on the size of that risk, since we got so much razzle-dazzle from Microsoft, and personal assurances that version 2 was going to correct some of the holes in the product (and be available in a timeframe that would mean something to our clients.)

Now, more than a year later, here we are with clients who are dissatisfied with what they got for their sizable investments, and I have to go and tell them that they are going to have to wait another year for improvements. Our clients bought CRM on the "Open Value" program so they could get 3 years of software assurance -- 3 years of included upgrades to the product. They will be into their Open Value licenses by almost 2 years before they get an upgrade. Meanwhile, they have growing businesses and growing demands, and growing gaps between CRM 1.2 functionality and their needs.

Listen, I still think CRM is great -- has great potential. I like it from the technology side, and even from the user side. But I have a higher threshold for holes and flaws than the salespeople at my clients' companies who were using ACT (which absolutely stinks). But at least ACT worked. Heck, I've got some people in CRM who had been using Access databases they made themselves -- and these are non-technical people -- and their Access databases did things that CRM can't do.

OK...I got that off my chest. I needed to rant and vent. Let me just say that I am looking forward to CRM 2005. I want Microsoft to get it right. I don't want them to release it until it is ready. I understand the delays. But Microsoft needs to do what is right by their early adopters -- basically their paying beta-testers. I'm talking about large refunds, free licenses, doubled Open Value terms -- something significant to reward those companies who are risking their success by going with Microsoft's promises over the competitors.

Comments anyone???

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

I absolutly agree with you !
We Have buy the 1.2 version with the hope of a more completed version for the first quarter of 2005 and it's delayed to the end of the year.
It's totaly unacceptable !

Julian said...

Well said!

I think MSCRM is a great product which does things really well that other CRM products don't but it is let down by partially completed functionality and missing functionality that is key for businesses.

We too have invested a lot in MSCRM, have been let down by MS in terms of (not) marketing the product and now have another 12 months before we get a version we were planning for in April/May.

There will always be a trade off between adding functionality and releasing software, after all there is always one more critical function to be added but I think this delay is wrong as from what i have seen CRM 2005 as is would have made a huge difference.

Anonymous said...

I too am disappointed about the release date slipping. However I don't believe it is reasonable to expect EVERYTHING to be perfect in the first release of a major product like MSCRM. We have been extremely pleased with MSCRM within our organization. Last Fall we switched to MSCRM from Goldmine and I can say that 100% of users are thrilled with MSCRM. The advantages far outweigh the missing functionality that is scheduled in the delayed release.

Nothing is ever perfect and I am impressed how much Microsoft got right on this first release.

So I'm looking forward to the next version but in the meantime I'm happy to have what I have.

Best regards,
Mike Parks

Anonymous said...

I am sorry but I am MSCRM and FrontRange (GoldMine) certified, and if it was my decision I would not move to MSCRM 1.2 given all the nice functions in GM at the moment that MS have missed out on. Team working benefits etc.

In some cases such as smaller businesses with lack of tech skills I don't think they ought to ever use it, and should remain on proprietary type systems - until MSCRM get the simplicity over hosting issues sorted out.

Granted its a very pretty product mind. Ought to work a lot better alongside IE7 (tabbed screens) and with the missing funtionality they are putting into it.

 
ICU MSCRM © 2004-2009